Skip to main content

Senate bill · S10388 (2025-26)

Defines satisfaction of judgment and authorizing satisfactions to be filed on affirmation

Latest action May 15, 2026

New York State Senate

Same as A10393, the matching bill in the Assembly.

Sponsor

James Sanders Jr.

State Senator, District 10 · Democratic

Follow

Summary

Defines the term "satisfaction" in relation to the satisfaction of judgments; allows satisfaction of judgments to be filed by affirmation rather than after notarization; increases the time during which attorneys may file satisfaction of judgment from ten to twenty years; clarifies that the twenty-day time limit applicable to filing satisfactions of judgment is measured in business days.

Summary from NY Open Legislation. How we handle summaries

From NY Open Legislation, the NY Senate and Assembly, and official rosters. This record was last updated Oct 21, 2026. About our data

Follow

Following needs an Agora account. You will sign in first, then come back to this page.

Your position on this bill

Choose the position closest to yours. You'll sign in or create an account to save it.

Purpose, from the sponsor's memo

This bill seeks to provide a debtor with notice more quickly after satisfying a judgment by streamlining the process attorneys use to file satisfactions.

Filed with the bill. Read it on nysenate.gov (opens in a new tab)

Where it stands

Passed one of the two chambers; it still needs the other.

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Up for a vote
  4. Passed one chamber
  5. Passed
  6. Enacted

Committee

Codes · New York State Assembly

Also referred to Codes · New York State Senate, Judiciary · New York State Assembly, Judiciary · New York State Senate.

The sponsor's argument

Why James Sanders Jr. says this is needed

In 2020, the Legislature took a significant step toward protecting judg- ment debtors by amending the CPLR to, require that, when a debtor pays off a judgment of less than $5,000, the judgment creditor or their attorney must file a satisfaction within 20 days or face a $100 penalty. However, this reform left a critical gap: the law did not define what constitutes a "satisfaction" or clarify when the clock starts ticking, particularly in cases involving payments that must clear or pass through an intermediary. This bill addresses those ambiguities head-on, ensuring a fairer and more efficient process for all. Specifically, it provides a definition of "satisfaction" that clarifies that the 20-day countdown begins only after a check has cleared or when a sheriff or marshal collecting a garnished wage remits the final payment or notifies the creditor that it has been received. Alternative definitions of the term would necessarily provide less time than the 20 days the statute intends for filing a satisfaction. This is crucial because, under the current system, back- logs and delays mean it is not uncommon for weeks to elapse after the final garnishment before the sheriff or marshal provides notification or remits that payment. Additionally, the bill clarifies that 20-day time limit In the law refers to business days, as a satisfaction can only be filed on a busi- ness day when the clerk's office is open. The bill also introduces a much-needed improvement for older judgments. Under current law, satis- factions for judgments over 10 years old require signatures from the parties involved, which can be problematic if those individuals are unavailable or untraceable. The bill allows attorneys to sign satisfac- tions for judgments up to 20 years old, streamlining the process and helping ensure that debtors receive timely proof of their satisfaction. Moreover, the bill incorporates recent CPLR changes that allow attorneys to affirm documents instead of having them notarized. This modernization eliminates unnecessary hurdles, speeding up the satisfaction process. For judgment debtors, this change has real, tangible benefits: faster satisfactions mean judgments are removed from credit reports more quick- ly, enabling consumers to rebuild their financial lives and access new credit opportunities sooner. Taken together, these updates will significantly Improve the system for debtors and consumers. By ensuring that satisfactions are filed promptly and efficiently, the bill reduces the time debtors must wait to see the judgment lifted from their credit history, release liens, and free them- selves from encumbrances. PRIOR HISTORY: 2026: New Bill

This is the sponsor's own case for the bill, quoted from their memorandum. It is not Agora's description of what the bill does.

Full history

  1. May 15, 2026

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO JUDICIARY

    NY Senate

  2. Apr 29, 2026

    Sent to the executive

    DELIVERED TO SENATE

    NY Assembly

  3. Apr 29, 2026

    Passed a chamber

    PASSED ASSEMBLY

    NY Assembly

  4. Apr 29, 2026

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO CODES

    NY Senate

  5. Mar 30, 2026

    Amended

    AMENDED ON THIRD READING 10393A

    NY Assembly

Show full history (3 earlier events)
  1. Mar 26, 2026

    Advanced to Third Reading CAL.337

    ADVANCED TO THIRD READING CAL.337

    NY Assembly

  2. Mar 24, 2026

    Reported out of committee

    REPORTED

    NY Assembly

  3. Mar 3, 2026

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO CODES

    NY Assembly