Skip to main content

Senate bill · S10404 (2025-26)

Directs the department of transportation and the New York state thruway authority to identify sites along all highways…

Official titleShow

Directs the department of transportation and the New York state thruway authority to identify sites along all highways, thruways and parkways in the state for wildlife crossings

The heading above is this same sentence with its legal opening removed. No words were added, changed or reordered.

Latest action May 22, 2026

New York State Senate

Same as A11477, the matching bill in the Assembly.

Sponsor

Leroy Comrie

State Senator, District 14 · Democratic

Follow

Summary

Enacts the "New York wildlife crossing act"; directs the department of transportation and the New York state thruway authority, in consultation with the department of environmental conservation and the department of motor vehicles, to identify sites along all highways, thruways and parkways in the state where wildlife crossings are most needed to increase public safety and improve habitat connectivity and create a priority list of wildlife opportunity areas where federal grant monies may be available to implement the top five projects identified.

Summary from NY Open Legislation. How we handle summaries

From NY Open Legislation, the NY Senate and Assembly, and official rosters. This record was last updated Oct 21, 2026. About our data

Follow

Following needs an Agora account. You will sign in first, then come back to this page.

Your position on this bill

Choose the position closest to yours. You'll sign in or create an account to save it.

Purpose, from the sponsor's memo

This bill intends to direct some portion of the federal funding avail- able for wildlife crossings to the state of New York for actionable development of wildlife crossing infrastructure. Several states have already implemented wildlife crossings on vehicular highways, thruways, and parkways. Absent such structures in New York State, this bill upon passage will ensure such projects can be identified, evaluated, and implemented where necessary and feasible. Data shows the design and construction of such structures reduces wildlife collisions by greater than ninety percent while improving habitat connectivity and roadway safety.

Filed with the bill. Read it on nysenate.gov (opens in a new tab)

Where it stands

Assigned to a committee for review.

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Up for a vote
  4. Passed one chamber
  5. Passed
  6. Enacted

Committee

Environmental Conservation · New York State Assembly

Also referred to Environmental Conservation · New York State Senate.

Cosponsors

Anthony H. Palumbo, Brian Kavanagh and 12 more on Agora

Showing the cosponsors who are on Agora, A to Z. The official record may list more.

Read on NY Senate (opens in a new tab)
  • Democratic9
  • Republican5

This bill has cosponsors from more than one party.

Shown in neutral colors by design; Agora is non-partisan.

The sponsor's argument

Why Leroy Comrie says this is needed

Roadkill and vehicular damage from collisions with wildlife is a serious problem in motor transportation. Crossing deer and other large mammals can create life-threatening hazards on roadways. In the United States alone, there are more than one million automobile accidents per year involving wildlife, resulting in billions of dollars in medical costs, vehicle repairs, insurance claims, and related economic losses annually. According to some estimates, automobile collisions kill more than a million animals every day, making them one of the leading causes of death for many vertebrate species. Still worse is the way major roads and other forms of development can subdivide animal populations and fragment habitats. Losing access to large areas of their living space makes it much harder for wildlife to forage for food, find mates, and maintain healthy genetic diversity. As people have become more aware of these dangers, one strategy to miti- gate them has gradually gained acceptance: human-made highway crossings designed specifically for animals. These can take many forms, depending on the species involved and the geographic features of the land. Common wildlife crossing structures include bridges and overpasses, tunnels, culverts, viaducts, and fencing systems designed to safely direct animal movement. Increasingly, such features are being incorporated into high- way planning and road improvement projects. When successfully imple- mented, they can significantly reduce wildlife-vehicle collisions, improve public safety, reconnect fragmented habitats, and lessen the environmental impact of transportation infrastructure. The concept was first developed in France in the 1950s and later widely expanded in the Netherlands, where hundreds of crossings have been constructed to protect badgers, elk, and other mammals. The Dutch also constructed the world's longest wildlife overpass, the Natuurbrug Zanderij Crailoo. Wildlife crossings are now used throughout Australia, Canada, and across the United States. Banff, Alberta, Canada witnessed one of the first highly successful wildlife crossing systems in North America. Since then, states including California, Colorado, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wyoming have constructed wildlife crossings of their own. These projects have substantially reduced roadkill, traffic fatali- ties, and property damage associated with wildlife-vehicle collisions. Federal funding opportunities for wildlife crossings remain available through the federal Wildlife Crossings Pilot Program and related infras- tructure and environmental grant programs. This bill creates a compre- hensive statewide process for identifying priority wildlife crossing sites, integrating wildlife considerations into transportation planning, and positioning New York State to compete effectively for available federal funding opportunities. Federal funding opportunities for wild- life crossings remain available Federal funding opportunities for wild- life crossings remain available By requiring coordination between transportation, environmental, and motor vehicle agencies, and by integrating wildlife crossing infrastruc- ture into future capital planning and roadway rehabilitation projects, this legislation advances both public safety and environmental steward- ship goals while ensuring transparency and accountability in project selection and implementation decisions.

This is the sponsor's own case for the bill, quoted from their memorandum. It is not Agora's description of what the bill does.

Full history

  1. May 22, 2026

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION

    NY Assembly

  2. May 15, 2026

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION

    NY Senate