Skip to main content

AgoraSign in

Lea Webb

Sponsor · State Senator, District 52 · Democratic/Working Families

Follow

Senate bill · S2053 (2025-26)

Relates to permits and financial security for reclamation for salt mining beneath a lake

Latest action Jan 7, 2026

Summary

Relates to permits and financial security for reclamation for salt mining beneath a lake; requires such permits to be subject to environmental quality review procedures; requires financial security to cover any damages directly or indirectly resulting from salt mining activities beneath a lake, including, but not limited to, those resulting from collapse or water contamination.

Your position on this bill

Not chosen yet

Sign in to choose

Where it stands

Out of committee and scheduled for a vote by the full chamber.

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Up for a vote
  4. Passed one chamber
  5. Passed
  6. Enacted

New York State Senate

Amends the Environmental Conservation Law.

Committee

Environmental Conservation · New York State Assembly

Also referred to Environmental Conservation · New York State Senate.

Purpose, from the sponsor's memo

Relates to permits and financial security for reclamation for salt mining beneath a lake SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1 of the bill amends subdivisions 11 and 12 of section 23-2711 of the environmental conservation law and adds new subdivisions 11-a and 14 to add requirements to the permit renewal process for projects that allow salt mining beneath a lake. Section 2 amends subdivision 6 of section 23-2715 of the environmental conservation law regarding the required financial security for reclama- tion for projects that include salt mining beneath a lake. Section 3 adds a new subdivision 3 to section 81 of the public lands law that requires the duration of such permit, consent or lease from New York State with respect to salt mining beneath a take be tied to the duration of the permit issued by the department of environmental conser- vation pursuant to title 27 of article 23 of the environmental conserva- tion law. Section 4 adds a severability clause. Section 5 adds the effective date.

Filed with the bill. Read it on nysenate.gov (opens in a new tab)

Recorded votes

  • Vote: Committee vote · Environmental Conservation

    Senate Environmental ConservationFeb 11, 2025Result: passed

    (8) (3) (0) (0)

The sponsor's argument

Why Lea Webb says this is needed

In August of 2023, Cargill, Inc. began the process of putting up for sale the Cayuga Salt Mine (CSM) it has operated for more than five (5) decades beneath Cayuga Lake in Lansing, NY in Tompkins County, where it operates on several thousand acres of land it leases from New York State. While the Mine Safety and Health Administration has been able to inspect the CSM operation for worker safety, the state Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) has not regularly inspected the mine for issues related to protecting the Cayuga Lake ecosystem. Now, after decades of mining by Cargill, Cayuga Lake is saltier than nearly all the other Finger Lakes. Further, due to continued mining and geologic condi- tions, without intervention from the DEC to require an environmental review, the lake is at risk of becoming permanently more saline. NYS public lands law authorizes the state Office of General Services (OGS) to grant the use of state-owned lands for mining purposes, includ- ing those lands found beneath takes. Since the mid 1970s, OGS has provided consent orders to the CSM owner, Cargill, to allow for salt mining under Cayuga Lake. The most recent consent order in 2019 provided that Cargill would be able to provide notice to OGS and then extend the consent order for ten years. This was done without the performance of an environmental impact statement (EIS) or environmental quality review (SEAR) under the New York State Department of Environmental Conserva- tion. DEC is also responsible for providing additional permitting through the Mined Land Reclamation Law, that includes reclamation and closure requirements of mined lands. Past civil lawsuits challenging the contin- uance of mining permits by the DEC have been dismissed. The assertions made in these lawsuits centered on the tack of DEC oversight or the requirement of an EIS on the mine in light of significant environmental issues with the Retsof salt mine in Livingston County, which, in 1994, collapsed and flooded, causing two sinkholes, significant subsidence damage, wells going dry, and the salinization of a freshwater aquifer. The geological similarities of these two mines has the communities surrounding Cayuga lake and its watershed justifiably concerned about the significant environmental and ecological risks of mine collapse. Cayuga Lake and its watershed is the largest in the region spanning seven (7) counties, covering 860 square mites with more than 140 streams that flow into the lake. Cayuga Lake itself is surrounded by a multitude of communities and supports a tourist economy seeking the natural beauty of the take and the opportunity to visit the many vineyards found along the Cayuga Lake Wine Trail. An accident within the salt mine below Cayu- ga Lake could have an immediate and severe impact, reducing the quality of the drinking water of about 100,000 residents and endangering the region's $3 billion, 60,000-employee food, wine and recreational tourism economy. Despite an EIS being fully warranted by the scope of the environmental risk posed by salt mining under a lake, the DEC, has, for decades, not required the owners of Cayuga Salt Mine to cooperate with an EIS proc- ess, despite repeated requests to do so.This legislation would bolster existing protections by explicitly requiring an environmental impact statement for mining under a lake where there has not been one for the preceding 20 years, as well as an updated reclamation plan along with appropriate financial security to ensure the communities relying on Cayuga Lake and its watershed are protected from potential harm.

This is the sponsor's own case for the bill, quoted from their memorandum. It is not Agora's description of what the bill does.

Full history

  1. Jan 7, 2026

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION

    NY Senate

  2. Jun 13, 2025

    In committee

    COMMITTED TO RULES

    NY Senate

  3. Feb 24, 2025

    Advanced to Third Reading

    ADVANCED TO THIRD READING

    NY Senate

  4. Feb 12, 2025

    2ND Report CAL.

    2ND REPORT CAL.

    NY Senate

  5. Feb 11, 2025

    1ST Report CAL.326

    1ST REPORT CAL.326

    NY Senate

Show full history (2 earlier events)
  1. Feb 3, 2025

    Amend and Recommit to Environmental Conservation

    AMEND AND RECOMMIT TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION

    NY Senate

  2. Jan 15, 2025

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION

    NY Senate

About this record

Summary

The summary comes from NY Open Legislation, the New York State Senate's public record. For more, see How we handle summaries.

Cosponsors

The list shows the cosponsors who are on Agora, A to Z. The official record may list more.

Party colors

Parties are shown in the same neutral colors.

Source

From NY Open Legislation, the NY Senate and Assembly, and official rosters. This record was last updated Oct 31, 2026. About our data

Read the record

Follow