Vote: Committee vote · Environmental Conservation
Senate Environmental ConservationMay 5, 2026Result: failed
Sponsor · State Senator, District 45 · Republican/Conservative/Independence
Senate bill · S2712 (2025-26)
Directs the public service commission to conduct a full cost benefit analysis on renewable energy systems; and makes changes in relation to greenhouse gas emission limits
The heading above is this same sentence with its legal opening removed. No words were added, changed or reordered.
Directs the public service commission to conduct a full cost benefit analysis of the technical and economic feasibility of renewable energy systems in the state of New York and to compare such directly with other methods of electricity generation; makes certain changes relating to greenhouse gas emissions limits.
Not chosen yet
Assigned to a committee for review.
New York State Senate
Same as A5395, the matching bill in the Assembly.
Amends the Environmental Conservation Law.
Environmental Conservation · New York State Assembly
Also referred to Environmental Conservation · New York State Senate.
To require an analysis of the costs of the state's emissions standards, require that the costs are a factor in the state's regulation of green- house gas emissions, and to extend the deadlines for meeting certain emissions levels by an additional 10 years.
Filed with the bill. Read it on nysenate.gov (opens in a new tab)
Senate Environmental ConservationMay 5, 2026Result: failed
Senate Environmental ConservationMay 13, 2025Result: failed
Andrea Bailey, Andrew Molitor and 46 more on Agora
The sponsor's argument
Any regulation of greenhouse gas emissions within New York state must be based on technological and economic realities. As such, this legislation would delay certain thresholds within the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act an additional decade, and require future decisions be based on empirical evidence and study. Some estimates show the CLCPA will annually cost individuals, families, farmers and businesses billions of dollars through increased taxes, utility bills, and home and business conversion and retrofit costs. Given the wide-ranging impact the CLCPA will have on families and busi- nesses, it has become clear that a full, transparent, and detailed proc- ess must take place to provide the public with a full accounting of the true and actual financial costs the full implementation of the CLCPA will have on state residents and businesses.
This is the sponsor's own case for the bill, quoted from their memorandum. It is not Agora's description of what the bill does.
Defeated in Environmental Conservation
DEFEATED IN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
NY Senate
In committee
NOTICE OF COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION - REQUESTED
NY Senate
Referred to committee
REFERRED TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
NY Assembly
Referred to committee
REFERRED TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
NY Senate
Held for Consideration in Environmental Conservation
HELD FOR CONSIDERATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
NY Assembly
Defeated in Environmental Conservation
DEFEATED IN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
NY Senate
In committee
NOTICE OF COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION - REQUESTED
NY Senate
Referred to committee
REFERRED TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
NY Assembly
Referred to committee
REFERRED TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
NY Senate
The summary comes from NY Open Legislation, the New York State Senate's public record. For more, see How we handle summaries.
The list shows the cosponsors who are on Agora, A to Z. The official record may list more.
Parties are shown in the same neutral colors.
From NY Open Legislation, the NY Senate and Assembly, and official rosters. This record was last updated Nov 1, 2026. About our data