Vote: Floor vote
NY SenateMar 19, 2026Result: passed
Sponsor · State Senator, District 28 · Democratic/Working Families
Senate bill · S3204 (2025-26)
Creates the offense of defrauding the government in the first degree and expands the definition of conspiracy in the fourth degree; relates to expanding the definition of tax fraud acts
The heading above is this same sentence with its legal opening removed. No words were added, changed or reordered.
Creates the offense of defrauding the government in the first degree; expands the definition of conspiracy in the fourth degree; relates to expanding the definition of tax fraud acts.
Not chosen yet
Passed one of the two chambers; it still needs the other.
New York State Senate
Amends the Penal Law.
Codes · New York State Assembly
Also referred to Codes · New York State Senate, Finance · New York State Senate.
1. Creates the offense of defrauding the government in the first degree. 2. Expands the definition of conspiracy in the fourth degree; relates to expanding the definition of tax fraud acts.
Filed with the bill. Read it on nysenate.gov (opens in a new tab)
NY SenateMar 19, 2026Result: passed
Senate FinanceMar 5, 2026Result: passed
Senate CodesFeb 4, 2026Result: passed
NY SenateMay 6, 2025Result: passed
Senate FinanceApr 29, 2025Result: passed
Senate CodesMar 10, 2025Result: passed
The sponsor's argument
For years, foreign countries with national sales taxes have struggled to combat technology that enables retailers to skim sales taxes and under report other tax liabilities (e.g. personal income tax, corporate income tax) by concealing from auditors their actual sales data. This technolo- gy, which includes automatic sales suppression devices, such as "zappers" and "phantom-ware," automatically suppresses digital sales figures recorded at electronic cash registers and Point of Sale systems. It is difficult for auditors to detect the use of automated sales suppression devices through the traditional process of cross checking transaction documents because the technology conceals almost all traces of the digital manipulation. Countries such as Germany and Greece have required retailers to install technological countermeasures that make it easier for auditors to detect the use of automated sales suppression devices. In September 2010, the Canadian province of Quebec began requiring all restaurants to install in their electronic cash registers anti-sales suppression devices. This cost Quebec an estimated $425 million ($410 million U.S.) in 2007-2008. Richard T. Ainsworth, a Boston University school of Law tax professor and a leading expert on zappers and other automated sales suppression devices, estimates that New York has faced a loss of $1.7 billion annually due to these devices. Because the United States lacks a national sales tax, there is no feder- al initiative to combat this tax fraud and most states are ill-prepared to deal with this issue. Nationwide, only a handful of people have been caught using this technology, including two in Michigan and one in Connecticut. Over 20 states have already enacted legislation to prohibit and criminalize automated sales suppression devices. Ainsworth has published several papers documenting the spread of zappers and phantom- ware in Quebec, Greece, Germany, the Netherlands and other European nations. Given that the first zappers were made in the United States and that this technology is widely used in the Canadian province just above of New York's northern border, it is imperative for the State to address this issue. The legislation would establish prohibitions and penalties related to the manufacture, sale, purchase, or use of automated sales suppression technology, creation of conspiracy for those who defraud the government, and the liability of those who perpetrate tax fraud. Additionally, this legislation would increase tax revenue by over $1 billion annually. FISCAL IMPACTS: Estimates increased tax revenue as high as $1 billion annually.
This is the sponsor's own case for the bill, quoted from their memorandum. It is not Agora's description of what the bill does.
Sent to the executive
DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
NY Senate
Passed a chamber
PASSED SENATE
NY Senate
Referred to committee
REFERRED TO CODES
NY Assembly
Advanced to Third Reading
ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
NY Senate
2ND Report CAL.
2ND REPORT CAL.
NY Senate
1ST Report CAL.462
1ST REPORT CAL.462
NY Senate
Referred to committee
REFERRED TO FINANCE
NY Senate
Died in Assembly
DIED IN ASSEMBLY
NY Assembly
Referred to committee
REFERRED TO CODES
NY Senate
Sent to the executive
DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
NY Senate
Passed a chamber
PASSED SENATE
NY Senate
Referred to committee
REFERRED TO CODES
NY Assembly
Advanced to Third Reading
ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
NY Senate
2ND Report CAL.
2ND REPORT CAL.
NY Senate
1ST Report CAL.756
1ST REPORT CAL.756
NY Senate
Reported out of committee
REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO FINANCE
NY Senate
Referred to committee
REFERRED TO CODES
NY Senate
The summary comes from NY Open Legislation, the New York State Senate's public record. For more, see How we handle summaries.
The list shows the cosponsors who are on Agora, A to Z. The official record may list more.
Parties are shown in the same neutral colors.
From NY Open Legislation, the NY Senate and Assembly, and official rosters. This record was last updated Nov 1, 2026. About our data