Vote: Floor vote
NY SenateMay 6, 2026Result: passed
Sponsor · Democratic/Working Families
Senate bill · S335 (2025-26)
Relates to actions or practices that establish or maintain a monopoly, monopsony or restraint of trade, and authorizes a class action lawsuit in the state anti-trust law
The heading above is this same sentence with its legal opening removed. No words were added, changed or reordered.
Relates to actions or practices that establish or maintain a monopoly, monopsony or restraint of trade; authorizes a class action lawsuit in the state anti-trust law.
Not chosen yet
Passed one of the two chambers; it still needs the other.
New York State Senate
Same as A2015, the matching bill in the Assembly.
Amends the General Business Law.
Consumer Protection · New York State Senate
To specify that any actions or practices which attempt to establish a monopoly or monopsony are illegal and void; to make unlawful that persons in a dominant position in the conduct of any business, trade, or commerce, in any labor market, abuse that dominant position; to prohibit certain vertical restraints; to establish premerger notification requirements; to allow for private enforcement and recoverable damages to be recovered; and to prohibit unfair methods of competition.
Filed with the bill. Read it on nysenate.gov (opens in a new tab)
NY SenateMay 6, 2026Result: passed
Senate RulesMay 4, 2026Result: passed
NY SenateJun 5, 2025Result: passed
Senate Consumer ProtectionMay 28, 2025Result: passed
Anna Kelles, Brian Kavanagh and 11 more on Agora
The sponsor's argument
Anti-trust laws are designed to promote a diverse economy by allowing for competition and preventing monopolies and monopsonies. Unilateral actions that seek to create a monopoly are just as harmful as contracts or agreements of multiple parties to do the same, and thus, such actions must also be banned by law. In addition, the abuse of a dominant posi- tion in a market can cause great harm to buyer and seller markets. Powerful corporations, particularly in Big Tech, have engaged in prac- tices such as temporary price reduction with the purpose of forcing competitors to sell their business to them. Such actions are contrary to the interests of the people of the state of New York and should be penalized accordingly. Moreover, an abuse of dominance standard like the one drafted in this bill is used in many other places across the world both within and outside of the EU and will aid the state in addressing abuses by dominant firms.
This is the sponsor's own case for the bill, quoted from their memorandum. It is not Agora's description of what the bill does.
Sent to the executive
DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
NY Senate
Passed a chamber
PASSED SENATE
NY Senate
Referred to committee
REFERRED TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
NY Assembly
In committee
COMMITTEE DISCHARGED AND COMMITTED TO RULES
NY Senate
Ordered to Third Reading CAL.879
ORDERED TO THIRD READING CAL.879
NY Senate
Died in Assembly
DIED IN ASSEMBLY
NY Assembly
Referred to committee
REFERRED TO CONSUMER PROTECTION
NY Senate
Referred to committee
REFERRED TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
NY Assembly
Sent to the executive
DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
NY Senate
Passed a chamber
PASSED SENATE
NY Senate
Referred to committee
REFERRED TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
NY Assembly
Advanced to Third Reading
ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
NY Senate
2ND Report CAL.
2ND REPORT CAL.
NY Senate
1ST Report CAL.1406
1ST REPORT CAL.1406
NY Senate
Referred to committee
REFERRED TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
NY Assembly
Referred to committee
REFERRED TO CONSUMER PROTECTION
NY Senate
The summary comes from NY Open Legislation, the New York State Senate's public record. For more, see How we handle summaries.
The list shows the cosponsors who are on Agora, A to Z. The official record may list more.
Parties are shown in the same neutral colors.
From NY Open Legislation, the NY Senate and Assembly, and official rosters. This record was last updated Oct 31, 2026. About our data