Skip to main content

AgoraSign in

Robert Jackson

Sponsor · State Senator, District 31 · Democratic/Working Families

Follow

Senate bill · S3413 (2025-26)

Relates to article 78 judgments regarding disability pension determinations

Latest action Apr 29, 2026

Summary

Permits court ruling in favor of a petitioner appealing the denial of a disability pension determination to grant disability pension.

Your position on this bill

Not chosen yet

Sign in to choose

Where it stands

Passed one of the two chambers; it still needs the other.

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Up for a vote
  4. Passed one chamber
  5. Passed
  6. Enacted

New York State Senate

Same as A533, the matching bill in the Assembly.

Committee

Judiciary · New York State Assembly

Also referred to Judiciary · New York State Senate.

Purpose, from the sponsor's memo

The purpose of this bill is to allow a court to annul a finding by a retirement system denying a disability pension if the finding was arbi- trary and capricious.

Filed with the bill. Read it on nysenate.gov (opens in a new tab)

Recorded votes

  • Vote: Floor vote

    NY SenateApr 29, 2026Result: passed

    (58) (0) (0) (5)
  • Vote: Committee vote · Judiciary

    Senate JudiciaryApr 21, 2026Result: passed

    (19) (0) (0) (0)
  • Vote: Floor vote

    NY SenateJun 12, 2025Result: passed

    (59) (0) (0) (4)
  • Vote: Committee vote · Judiciary

    Senate JudiciaryMar 11, 2025Result: passed

    (19) (0) (0) (0)

The sponsor's argument

Why Robert Jackson says this is needed

Public employees disabled from the performance of their duties are, in appropriate circumstances, entitled to disability pensions. Public retirement systems have established review boards to determine whether an applicant for a disability pension has met the criteria for the grant of the petition. An applicant denied such a pension may seek review pursuant to Article 78 to overturn that decision. The standard of review applied by the court in such cases is exacting: the court may overturn the decision only upon finding that the retirement system acted arbi- trarily or capriciously. Unfortunately, even when an individual meets this burden and establishes that the retirement system's decision was arbitrary or capricious, courts often refrain from granting the employee the pension sought but, instead, remand the matter to the retirement system for further action. The remand results in delay and further expense to the employee. Worse, retirement systems are hereby afforded the opportunity to deny the application for a different reason, forcing the employee to undertake yet another legal challenge. There is no remedy if a retirement system acts with impunity in these circumstances. Employees frequently just give up the fight, even though their claims are well-supported by medical and other evidence. This Act will make clear that a court has the power, when it finds a retirement system has acted arbitrarily or capriciously, not just to invalidate the system's decision but to go further and order that the employee's application for a disability pension be granted. Justice really demands no less.

This is the sponsor's own case for the bill, quoted from their memorandum. It is not Agora's description of what the bill does.

Full history

  1. Apr 29, 2026

    Sent to the executive

    DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY

    NY Senate

  2. Apr 29, 2026

    Passed a chamber

    PASSED SENATE

    NY Senate

  3. Apr 29, 2026

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO JUDICIARY

    NY Assembly

  4. Apr 27, 2026

    Advanced to Third Reading

    ADVANCED TO THIRD READING

    NY Senate

  5. Apr 22, 2026

    2ND Report CAL.

    2ND REPORT CAL.

    NY Senate

Show full history (12 earlier events)
  1. Apr 21, 2026

    1ST Report CAL.748

    1ST REPORT CAL.748

    NY Senate

  2. Jan 7, 2026

    Died in Assembly

    DIED IN ASSEMBLY

    NY Assembly

  3. Jan 7, 2026

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO JUDICIARY

    NY Senate

  4. Jan 7, 2026

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO JUDICIARY

    NY Assembly

  5. Jun 13, 2025

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO JUDICIARY

    NY Assembly

  6. Jun 12, 2025

    Sent to the executive

    DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY

    NY Senate

  7. Jun 12, 2025

    Passed a chamber

    PASSED SENATE

    NY Senate

  8. Mar 13, 2025

    Advanced to Third Reading

    ADVANCED TO THIRD READING

    NY Senate

  9. Mar 12, 2025

    2ND Report CAL.

    2ND REPORT CAL.

    NY Senate

  10. Mar 11, 2025

    1ST Report CAL.539

    1ST REPORT CAL.539

    NY Senate

  11. Jan 27, 2025

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO JUDICIARY

    NY Senate

  12. Jan 8, 2025

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO JUDICIARY

    NY Assembly

About this record

Summary

The summary comes from NY Open Legislation, the New York State Senate's public record. For more, see How we handle summaries.

Cosponsors

The list shows the cosponsors who are on Agora, A to Z. The official record may list more.

Party colors

Parties are shown in the same neutral colors.

Source

From NY Open Legislation, the NY Senate and Assembly, and official rosters. This record was last updated Nov 1, 2026. About our data

Read the record

Follow