Skip to main content

AgoraSign in

Leroy Comrie

Sponsor · State Senator, District 14 · Democratic

Follow

Senate bill · S4375 (2025-26)

Relates to requiring mandatory arbitration clauses in certain consumer contracts to be disclosed to the consumer

Latest action Jan 7, 2026

Summary

Requires mandatory arbitration clauses in certain consumer contracts to be disclosed and explained to the consumer.

Your position on this bill

Not chosen yet

Sign in to choose

Where it stands

Out of committee and scheduled for a vote by the full chamber.

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Up for a vote
  4. Passed one chamber
  5. Passed
  6. Enacted

New York State Senate

Same as A3369, the matching bill in the Assembly.

Amends the General Business Law.

Committee

Consumer Affairs and Protection · New York State Assembly

Also referred to Consumer Protection · New York State Senate.

Purpose, from the sponsor's memo

This bill would require representatives of companies responsible for administering a contract for consumer goods, services, or employment to a consumer to disclose the existence of any mandatory arbitration clause contained within the contract, and clearly explain what a mandatory arbitration clause is.

Filed with the bill. Read it on nysenate.gov (opens in a new tab)

The sponsor's argument

Why Leroy Comrie says this is needed

As mandatory arbitration clauses in contracts for consumer goods, services, and employment have become more and more commonplace, consum- ers are increasingly forced to resolve disputes via arbitration. In many cases, consumers are unaware that the contract they are signing requires them to resolve disputes through arbitration, and not through the court system. They are in effect unknowingly signing away the right to their "day in court." Questions continue to be raised about the fairness of the arbitration process, due to studies finding that arbiters tend to disproportionately rule in favor of businesses over the consumers.Private arbitration companies have a financial incentive to rule in favor of the business that is paying for their services. Given these questions, it is appro- priate to clearly disclose the existence of an arbitration clause in a contract and ensure that the consumer understands the meaning and ramification of the clause before agreeing to sign the contract.

This is the sponsor's own case for the bill, quoted from their memorandum. It is not Agora's description of what the bill does.

Full history

  1. Jan 7, 2026

    Ordered to Third Reading CAL.109

    ORDERED TO THIRD READING CAL.109

    NY Assembly

  2. Jan 7, 2026

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO CONSUMER PROTECTION

    NY Senate

  3. May 8, 2025

    Advanced to Third Reading CAL.127

    ADVANCED TO THIRD READING CAL.127

    NY Assembly

  4. May 6, 2025

    Amend and Recommit to Consumer Protection

    AMEND AND RECOMMIT TO CONSUMER PROTECTION

    NY Senate

  5. May 6, 2025

    Reported out of committee

    REPORTED

    NY Assembly

Show full history (3 earlier events)
  1. Apr 2, 2025

    Amend and Recommit to Consumer Affairs and Protection

    AMEND AND RECOMMIT TO CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND PROTECTION

    NY Assembly

  2. Feb 4, 2025

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO CONSUMER PROTECTION

    NY Senate

  3. Jan 27, 2025

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND PROTECTION

    NY Assembly

About this record

Summary

The summary comes from NY Open Legislation, the New York State Senate's public record. For more, see How we handle summaries.

Cosponsors

The list shows the cosponsors who are on Agora, A to Z. The official record may list more.

Party colors

Parties are shown in the same neutral colors.

Source

From NY Open Legislation, the NY Senate and Assembly, and official rosters. This record was last updated Nov 1, 2026. About our data

Read the record

Follow