Skip to main content

Senate bill · S5939 (2025-26)

Relates to payments by a pharmacy benefit manager to participating pharmacies

PassedLatest action Jun 5, 2026

New York State Senate

Same as A5882, the matching bill in the Assembly.

Sponsor

James Skoufis

State Senator, District 42 · Democratic

Follow

Summary

Requires a pharmacy benefit manager to pay a participating pharmacy at minimum at the national average drug acquisition cost (NADAC) rate, or at the pharmacy acquisition cost rate if greater or there is not a NADAC rate, plus a professional dispensing fee that is at minimum the professional dispensing fee paid under the state medical assistance program.

Summary from NY Open Legislation. How we handle summaries

Amends the Public Health Law.

From NY Open Legislation, the NY Senate and Assembly, and official rosters. This record was last updated Oct 22, 2026. About our data

Follow

Following needs an Agora account. You will sign in first, then come back to this page.

Your position on this bill

Choose the position closest to yours. You'll sign in or create an account to save it.

Purpose, from the sponsor's memo

Section 1: Amends subdivision 1 of section 280-a of the public health law by adding paragraphs (j) and (k). To define the Pharmacy Acquisition Cost Rate as the cost a participating pharmacy pays to acquire drugs, including generic, brand-name, biologics, and those produced through genetic or biopharmaceutical processes, based on pharmacy cost invoices. It also defines the National Average Drug Acquisition Cost as the month- ly survey conducted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to determine the average acquisition cost of Medicaid-covered outpatient drugs. Section 2: Amends subdivision 3 of section 280-a of the public health law to add a paragraph (b). To prohibit pharmacy benefit managers from substituting or altering prescription drugs without prescriber approval or legal authorization. The superintendent and commissioner may issue regulations on when substitutions are permitted. Additionally, pharmacy benefit managers must reimburse participating pharmacies at least the National Average Drug Acquisition Cost (NADAC) rate or the Pharmacy Acquisition Cost Rate, whichever is higher, plus a professional dispens- ing fee equal to that paid under the state medical assistance program. For medications requiring specialized handling, distribution, adminis- tration, patient education, care coordination, monitoring, special pack- aging, or shipping, pharmacies must receive an additional dispensing fee to ensure they are not reimbursed below their acquisition and dispensing costs. Section 3: Amends the opening paragraph of subdivision 4 of section 280-a of the public health law. To require pharmacy benefit managers to establish a. reasonable process for pharmacies or their contracting agents to appeal, investigate, and resolve disputes over drug pricing for multi-source generics, brand-name drugs, biologics, and drugs produced through genetic or biopharmaceutical processes. Section 4: Amends section 2911 of the insurance law to add a new subsection (d) to ensure that pharmacy benefit managers reimburse phar- macies fairly by covering the actual cost of acquiring and dispensing medications. It mandates payment at either the National Average Drug Acquisition Cost (NADAC) rate or the Pharmacy Acquisition Cost Rate, if there is not a NADAC rate, along with a professional dispensing fee. Additional compensation is required for drugs needing special handling, administration, or monitoring. The amendment also establishes a stand- ardized appeals process for pharmacies to dispute pricing issues. This paragraph does not apply to prescriptions or prescription drugs that are distributed or paid for by a trust fund established under the Labor Management Relations Act, or provided through a health, welfare, or pharmaceutical plan that has been created, adopted, or funded as part of a collective bargaining agreement between an employer and a labor organ- ization or certified employee organization. Section 5: Sets Effective Date.

Filed with the bill. Read it on nysenate.gov (opens in a new tab)

Where it stands

Passed the legislature and is awaiting a signature.

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Up for a vote
  4. Passed one chamber
  5. Passed
  6. Enacted

Committee

Health · New York State Assembly

Also referred to Health · New York State Senate, Insurance · New York State Assembly, Insurance · New York State Senate, Ways and Means · New York State Assembly.

Cosponsors

Al Taylor, Albert A. Stirpe and 139 more on Agora

Showing the cosponsors who are on Agora, A to Z. The official record may list more.

Read on NY Senate (opens in a new tab)
  • Democratic106
  • Republican35

This bill has cosponsors from more than one party.

Shown in neutral colors by design; Agora is non-partisan.

Show the full list (141 names)

The sponsor's argument

Why James Skoufis says this is needed

This bill is part of an ongoing effort to reduce prescription drug costs for patients, enhance pharmacy access in underserved areas, and increase transparency regarding the costs that plan sponsors and employers are paying for prescription drugs, ultimately leading to significant cost savings. This initiative adopts the Cost-Plus reimbursement methodology, which New York State Medicaid implemented in 2023. This approach has resulted in consistent patient coverage, enhanced rebate revenues, and a stabilization of prescription drug costs. Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) play a crucial role in delivering phar- macy services, working on behalf of plan sponsors or employers to manage pharmacy benefits. Historically, PBMs were primarily responsible for processing claims. However, over the past two decades, they have oper- ated in a largely opaque environment, negotiating rebates with pharma- ceutical companies intending to reduce prescription costs. Unfortunate- ly, the savings from these rebates have not been passed on to patients or those paying for pharmacy benefits. Year after year, insurance premi- ums for commercial health plans have risen by 8-13%, with pharmaceutical companies being blamed as the primary driver of these increases. This is despite the fact that, in 2024, the list prices for average brand-name drugs grew by only 2.3%. After adjusting for overall inflation, the net prices of brand-name drugs have actually dropped for seven consecutive years. This discrepancy is largely attributed to the "rebate pumping" phenomenon, where PBMs negotiate higher rebates by increasing drug pric- es, creating a gross-to-net pricing bubble. Given that PBMs are licensed and monitored by the New York State Depart- ment of Financial Services (DFS), the time has come to bring greater transparency to the actual cost of prescription drugs. By adopting the National Average Drug Acquisition Cost (NADAC) as a national standard for determining pharmacy reimbursement, we can more accurately reflect the costs incurred by pharmacies to acquire medications. The Cost-Plus methodology moves away from the previously used Average Wholesale Price (AWP) model, which was often inflated, as well as the Wholesaler Acqui- sition Cost (WAC) and Maximum Acquisition Cost (MAC) pricing methodol- ogies, which were inconsistent and did not accurately capture pharmaceu- tical costs. NADAC, a nationally recognized benchmark, is so .widely accepted that the three major PBMs, which control over 80% of all phar- macy claims, have announced plans to adopt the Cost-Plus model for commercial plans by 2026. The bill is also critical in light of years of bipartisan findings by the U.S. Congress and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). It highlights how PBMs have established reimbursement practices that favor their phar- macies over independent pharmacies and steer high-cost specialty drugs to their operations. Despite denials from the major PBMs, the FTC has been highly critical of these practices, and the 119th Congress is actively exploring measures to increase scrutiny, transparency, and accountability in the management of public funds. The passage of the this bill will provide a clear, standardized frame- work for pharmaceutical reimbursement that benefits both patients and payors. This legislation will ensure stable reimbursement to pharmacies regardless of ownership or location. It represents a significant step toward creating a more transparent, equitable, and sustainable pharma- ceutical pricing system.

This is the sponsor's own case for the bill, quoted from their memorandum. It is not Agora's description of what the bill does.

Recorded votes

  • Vote: Floor vote

    NY SenateMay 28, 2026Result: passed

    (58) (2) (0) (3)
  • Vote: Floor vote

    NY SenateFeb 24, 2026Result: passed

    (55) (1) (0) (7)
  • Vote: Committee vote · Health

    Senate HealthFeb 9, 2026Result: passed

    (14) (0) (0) (1)
  • Vote: Floor vote

    NY SenateJun 13, 2025Result: passed

    (57) (2) (0) (4)
  • Vote: Committee vote · Rules

    Senate RulesJun 12, 2025Result: passed

    (20) (0) (0) (1)

Full history

  1. Jun 5, 2026

    Passed a chamber

    PASSED ASSEMBLY

    NY Assembly

  2. Jun 5, 2026

    Returned to Senate

    RETURNED TO SENATE

    NY Assembly

  3. Jun 4, 2026

    Reported out of committee

    REPORTED REFERRED TO RULES

    NY Assembly

  4. Jun 4, 2026

    Rules Report CAL.483

    RULES REPORT CAL.483

    NY Assembly

  5. Jun 4, 2026

    Substituted

    SUBSTITUTED BY S5939C

    NY Assembly

Show full history (28 earlier events)
  1. May 28, 2026

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO WAYS AND MEANS

    NY Assembly

  2. May 28, 2026

    Passed a chamber

    REPASSED SENATE

    NY Senate

  3. May 28, 2026

    Returned to Assembly

    RETURNED TO ASSEMBLY

    NY Senate

  4. May 20, 2026

    Reported out of committee

    REPORTED REFERRED TO WAYS AND MEANS

    NY Assembly

  5. Mar 11, 2026

    Amended

    AMENDED ON THIRD READING 5939C

    NY Senate

  6. Mar 11, 2026

    Recalled From Assembly

    RECALLED FROM ASSEMBLY

    NY Senate

  7. Mar 11, 2026

    Returned to Senate

    RETURNED TO SENATE

    NY Assembly

  8. Feb 24, 2026

    Amend and Recommit to Insurance

    AMEND AND RECOMMIT TO INSURANCE

    NY Assembly

  9. Feb 24, 2026

    Sent to the executive

    DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY

    NY Senate

  10. Feb 24, 2026

    Passed a chamber

    PASSED SENATE

    NY Senate

  11. Feb 24, 2026

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO INSURANCE

    NY Assembly

  12. Feb 11, 2026

    Advanced to Third Reading

    ADVANCED TO THIRD READING

    NY Senate

  13. Feb 10, 2026

    2ND Report CAL.

    2ND REPORT CAL.

    NY Senate

  14. Feb 9, 2026

    1ST Report CAL.305

    1ST REPORT CAL.305

    NY Senate

  15. Jan 7, 2026

    Died in Assembly

    DIED IN ASSEMBLY

    NY Assembly

  16. Jan 7, 2026

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO HEALTH

    NY Senate

  17. Jan 7, 2026

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO INSURANCE

    NY Assembly

  18. Jul 2, 2025

    Reference Changed to Insurance

    REFERENCE CHANGED TO INSURANCE

    NY Assembly

  19. Jun 13, 2025

    Sent to the executive

    DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY

    NY Senate

  20. Jun 13, 2025

    Passed a chamber

    PASSED SENATE

    NY Senate

  21. Jun 13, 2025

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO HEALTH

    NY Assembly

  22. Jun 12, 2025

    In committee

    COMMITTEE DISCHARGED AND COMMITTED TO RULES

    NY Senate

  23. Jun 12, 2025

    Ordered to Third Reading CAL.1985

    ORDERED TO THIRD READING CAL.1985

    NY Senate

  24. Jun 9, 2025

    Amend and Recommit to Health

    AMEND AND RECOMMIT TO HEALTH

    NY Assembly

  25. Jun 8, 2025

    Amend and Recommit to Health

    AMEND AND RECOMMIT TO HEALTH

    NY Senate

  26. Jun 6, 2025

    Amend and Recommit to Health

    AMEND AND RECOMMIT TO HEALTH

    NY Senate

  27. Mar 4, 2025

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO HEALTH

    NY Senate

  28. Feb 24, 2025

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO HEALTH

    NY Assembly