Vote: Floor vote
NY SenateApr 30, 2025Result: passedSenate vote on A6762, the matching Assembly bill.
Sponsor · State Senator, District 14 · Democratic
Senate bill · S7230 (2025-26)
Ensures energy services companies are subject to the same consumer protection regulations regarding unclaimed deposits and refunds currently facing utility companies
The heading above is this same sentence with its legal opening removed. No words were added, changed or reordered.
Ensures energy services companies are subject to the same consumer protection regulations regarding unclaimed deposits and refunds currently facing utility companies.
Not chosen yet
Signed into law.
New York State Senate
Same as A6762, the matching bill in the Assembly.
Passed as A6762, the matching Assembly bill.
Amends the Abandoned Property Law.
Energy · New York State Assembly
Also referred to Finance · New York State Senate.
To close a statutory loophole that allows ESCOs to retain unclaimed customer deposits or refunds, rather than remitting such unclaimed funds to the Abandoned Property Fund administered by the State comptroller.
Filed with the bill. Read it on nysenate.gov (opens in a new tab)
NY SenateApr 30, 2025Result: passedSenate vote on A6762, the matching Assembly bill.
Senate RulesApr 24, 2025Result: passed
Angelo Santabarbara, Jonathan Jacobson and 1 more on Agora
The sponsor's argument
This change would make it easier for ESCO customers to obtain their unclaimed funds and strengthen the deterrence effect of the Commission's ESCO enforcement orders. The unclaimed funds would not be remitted to the comptroller unless the ESCO's efforts to contact the rightful owner have failed. Given how often ESCO customers tend to switch service providers, ESCOs' customer contact information is especially prone to going stale. This reduces the likelihood that ESCOs will be able to find the funds' rightful owners. In addition, some ESCOs may have only short connections to New York: ESCOs may abandon their New York presence, or their eligibility may be revoked. Exploiting the current statutory loophole, an ESCO may have little incentive to set aside funds for New York customers. A former customer is more likely to learn about their unclaimed funds from the state, which regularly publicizes its unclaimed funds recovery process, than from an ESCO with which the customer no longer has a relationship. This change would ensure that, when the Commission penalizes ESCO misconduct by ordering customer refunds, the ESCO cannot retain those funds indefinitely in spite of their miscon- duct. They will instead forfeit the funds, either to the rightful owner or, failing that, the comptroller. FISCAL IMPLICATION: None.
This is the sponsor's own case for the bill, quoted from their memorandum. It is not Agora's description of what the bill does.
Sent to the executive
DELIVERED TO GOVERNOR
NY Assembly
Signed
SIGNED CHAP.129
NY Assembly
3RD Reading CAL.690
3RD READING CAL.690
NY Senate
Passed a chamber
PASSED SENATE
NY Senate
Substituted
SUBSTITUTED FOR S7230
NY Senate
In committee
COMMITTEE DISCHARGED AND COMMITTED TO RULES
NY Senate
Ordered to Third Reading CAL.690
ORDERED TO THIRD READING CAL.690
NY Senate
Sent to the executive
DELIVERED TO SENATE
NY Assembly
Passed a chamber
PASSED ASSEMBLY
NY Assembly
Referred to committee
REFERRED TO FINANCE
NY Senate
Reported out of committee
REPORTED REFERRED TO RULES
NY Assembly
Rules Report CAL.147
RULES REPORT CAL.147
NY Assembly
Referred to committee
REFERRED TO FINANCE
NY Senate
Referred to committee
REFERRED TO ENERGY
NY Assembly
The summary comes from NY Open Legislation, the New York State Senate's public record. For more, see How we handle summaries.
The list shows the cosponsors who are on Agora, A to Z. The official record may list more.
Parties are shown in the same neutral colors.
From NY Open Legislation, the NY Senate and Assembly, and official rosters. This record was last updated Oct 22, 2026. About our data