Sponsor · State Senator, District 59 · Democratic/Working Families
Senate bill · S7407 (2025-26)
Ensures that the provisions governing liquor licenses are consistent with respect to public interest factors
Summary
Ensures that the provisions governing liquor licenses are consistent with respect to public interest factors.
Your position on this bill
Not chosen yet
Where it stands
Out of committee and scheduled for a vote by the full chamber.
- Introduced
- In committee
- Up for a vote
- Passed one chamber
- Passed
- Enacted
New York State Senate
Same as A10995, the matching bill in the Assembly.
Amends the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law.
Committee
Commerce, Economic Development And Small Business · New York State Senate
Purpose, from the sponsor's memo
This bill would make consistent the factors that may be considered by the state Liquor Authority (SLA) when determining whether public conven- ience and advantage, and the public interest will be promoted by the granting of any of the on-premises liquor licenses provided for in Arti- cle 5 of the Alcoholic Beverage control (ABC) Law.
Filed with the bill. Read it on nysenate.gov (opens in a new tab)
Cosponsors
The sponsor's argument
Why Kristen Gonzalez says this is needed
Current ABC Law § 64(6-a) sets forth certain factors that the SLA can consider when evaluating the merits of an application for an on-premises restaurant liquor license. However, the ABC Law does not explicitly state that such factors may be considered for on-premises liquor poten- tial problems associated with an over-concentration of restaurants and taverns prompted enactment of Chapter 670 of the Laws of 1993, which gave the SLA the permissive power to consider any or all of the follow- ing factors when evaluating the merits of a new application for an on premises liquor license:(a) the number, classes and character of licenses in proximity to the SPONSOR: SQUA location and in the partic- ular municipality or subdivision thereof; evidence that all necessary licenses and permits have been obtained from the state and all other governing bodies; (c) effect of the grant of the license on vehicular; traffic and parking in proximity to the Location;(d),the existing noise level at the location and any increase in noise Level that the proposed premises would generate;(e) the history of liquor violations and reported criminal activity at the proposed premises; and(f) the history of building and fire violations at any businesses owned and/or operated by the applicant(g) history of city of New York Community Board Opinions and Decisions made pursuant to the alcohol and beverage control law for businesses owned and/or operated by the applicant; and (h) any other factors specified by law or regulation that are relevant to determine the "public convenience and advantage and public interest" of the commu- nity.This Legislative grant of power had the effect of over-ruling the decision of the Court of Appeals in Matter of Circus Disco Ltd. v. New York. State Liquor Auth., 51 NY.2d 24 (1980), which held in part that under the pre-amendment statute, the adverse effect that a new on-prem- ises Liquor establishment would have on vehicular traffic, parking, and noise levels were beyond the purview of the SLA. The Court held that those considerations appropriately reside within the exclusive discretion of local zoning officials. In 2000, ABC Law § 64-d(7) was amended and requires the SLA to consider all of the factors this bill would mandate when determining whether public conven- ience and advantage and the public interest would be promoted by the grant of a cabaret liquor license. Amendment of ABC Law § 64 (restau- rant), 64-a (tavern), 64-b (bottle club), and 64-c (restaurant-brewer) - to more consistently parallel ABCL § 64-d (7), is desirable in order to make consistent all of the factors that may be considered by the SLA when determining whether public convenience and advantage and the public interest will be promoted by the grant of a specific on-premises liquor license to a particular applicant.
This is the sponsor's own case for the bill, quoted from their memorandum. It is not Agora's description of what the bill does.
Full history
- Apr 23, 2026
Advanced to Third Reading CAL.388
ADVANCED TO THIRD READING CAL.388
NY Assembly
- Apr 21, 2026
Reported out of committee
REPORTED
NY Assembly
- Apr 15, 2026
Referred to committee
REFERRED TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
NY Assembly
- Jan 7, 2026
Referred to committee
REFERRED TO COMMERCE, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND SMALL BUSINESS
NY Senate
- May 27, 2025
Reported out of committee
REPORTED
NY Assembly
Show full history (4 earlier events)Show less history
- May 27, 2025
Rules Report CAL.268
RULES REPORT CAL.268
NY Assembly
- May 20, 2025
Reported out of committee
REPORTED REFERRED TO RULES
NY Assembly
- Apr 15, 2025
Referred to committee
REFERRED TO COMMERCE, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND SMALL BUSINESS
NY Senate
- Mar 6, 2025
Referred to committee
REFERRED TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
NY Assembly
About this record
- Summary
The summary comes from NY Open Legislation, the New York State Senate's public record. For more, see How we handle summaries.
- Cosponsors
The list shows the cosponsors who are on Agora, A to Z. The official record may list more.
- Party colors
Parties are shown in the same neutral colors.
- Source
From NY Open Legislation, the NY Senate and Assembly, and official rosters. This record was last updated Nov 3, 2026. About our data
Read the record
- Read on NY Senate (opens in a new tab) The official record on nysenate.gov.