Skip to main content

Senate bill · S7499 (2025-26)

Relates to the definition and term of real estate listing agreements

Latest action May 29, 2026

New York State Senate

Same as A8120, the matching bill in the Assembly.

Sponsor

Rachel May

State Senator, District 48 · Democratic/Working Families

Follow

Summary

Relates to the definition and term of real estate listing agreements; provides that no real estate broker shall be a party to a listing agreement if such agreement is for a period longer than two years; provides that a listing agreement shall not be enforceable if the agreement is for a period longer than two years.

Summary from NY Open Legislation. How we handle summaries

Amends the Real Property Law.

From NY Open Legislation, the NY Senate and Assembly, and official rosters. This record was last updated Oct 20, 2026. About our data

Follow

Following needs an Agora account. You will sign in first, then come back to this page.

Your position on this bill

Choose the position closest to yours. You'll sign in or create an account to save it.

Purpose, from the sponsor's memo

To place reasonable limits on the length of residential listing agree- ments and ensure homeowners retain control over the sale or lease of their property.

Filed with the bill. Read it on nysenate.gov (opens in a new tab)

Where it stands

Passed one of the two chambers; it still needs the other.

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Up for a vote
  4. Passed one chamber
  5. Passed
  6. Enacted

Committee

Judiciary · New York State Assembly

Also referred to Judiciary · New York State Senate.

Cosponsors

Judy Griffin, Leroy Comrie and 2 more on Agora

Showing the cosponsors who are on Agora, A to Z. The official record may list more.

Read on NY Senate (opens in a new tab)
  • Democratic3
  • Republican1

This bill has cosponsors from more than one party.

Shown in neutral colors by design; Agora is non-partisan.

The sponsor's argument

Why Rachel May says this is needed

Most homeowners only sell a property once or twice in their lifetime. When they sign a listing agreement with a real estate broker, they're entering a legal contract-often under time pressure or with limited understanding of what's negotiable. These agreements can include long terms, vague renewal provisions, or even automatic extensions that home- owners may not be fully aware of when signing. In some cases, property owners find themselves locked into contracts for years, even if the broker is no longer actively marketing the property or the relationship has broken down. This bill addresses that imbalance. It sets a reasonable two-year cap on the length of a residential listing agreement and prohibits exclusive agreements from rolling over automatically. These are modest, common- sense consumer protections that ensure homeowners maintain control over who represents their interests and for how long. Uncapped or open-ended contracts distort the market by discouraging competition. When brokers know they have a client tied up indefinitely, there may be less incen- tive to maintain a high level of service. And when homeowners feel stuck in an agreement they can't easily get out of, it undermines confidence in the real estate process. By contrast, time-limited agreements promote a healthier market dynamic: brokers are motivated to perform, and home- owners retain the ability to reassess and make changes if needed. Nothing in this bill prevents a homeowner from renewing a relationship with a trusted broker. But it ensures that such renewals are intention- al-not automatic. Especially in an industry where many deals hinge on trust and transparency, this reform offers both brokers and clients a clearer, more equitable framework. These updates reflect a modem under- standing of consumer protection, one that respects the stakes involved in selling a home and creates a fairer playing field for all parties involved.

This is the sponsor's own case for the bill, quoted from their memorandum. It is not Agora's description of what the bill does.

Recorded votes

  • Vote: Floor vote

    NY SenateMay 29, 2026Result: passed

    (50) (8) (0) (5)
  • Vote: Committee vote · Judiciary

    Senate JudiciaryMay 12, 2026Result: passed

    (19) (0) (0) (0)

Full history

  1. May 29, 2026

    Sent to the executive

    DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY

    NY Senate

  2. May 29, 2026

    Passed a chamber

    PASSED SENATE

    NY Senate

  3. May 29, 2026

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO JUDICIARY

    NY Assembly

  4. May 14, 2026

    Advanced to Third Reading

    ADVANCED TO THIRD READING

    NY Senate

  5. May 13, 2026

    2ND Report CAL.

    2ND REPORT CAL.

    NY Senate

Show full history (5 earlier events)
  1. May 12, 2026

    1ST Report CAL.1017

    1ST REPORT CAL.1017

    NY Senate

  2. Jan 7, 2026

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO JUDICIARY

    NY Senate

  3. Jan 7, 2026

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO JUDICIARY

    NY Assembly

  4. May 1, 2025

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO JUDICIARY

    NY Assembly

  5. Apr 21, 2025

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO JUDICIARY

    NY Senate