Skip to main content

Senate bill · S7676 (2025-26)

Allows for justices to reside in any town, village or city within the same assembly district as the court such justice serves and establishes educational…

New York State Senate

Same as A964, the matching bill in the Assembly.

Latest action Apr 29, 2025
Official titleShow

Allows for justices to reside in any town, village or city within the same assembly district as the court such justice serves and establishes educational requirements for certain town and village justices

The heading above is this same sentence with its legal opening removed. No words were added, changed or reordered.

Follow

Following needs an Agora account. You will sign in first, then come back to this page.

From NY Open Legislation, the NY Senate and Assembly, and official rosters. This record was last updated Oct 20, 2026. About our data

Summary

Allows for justices to reside in any town, village or city contained in whole or in part within the same assembly district as the court such justice serves or in an assembly district contiguous to such municipality where the court is located; authorizes towns and villages to require that any person who serves as a town or village justice be admitted to practice law in the state.

Summary from NY Open Legislation. How we handle summaries

Purpose, from the sponsor's memo

This bill allows a justice of a local justice court, also known as town, village, or city court, to live within the same assembly district as the court on which they serve; and allows' for towns or villages to vote to require town or village justices be admitted to practice law in New York State.

Filed with the bill. Read it on nysenate.gov (opens in a new tab)

Where it stands

Assigned to a committee for review.

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Up for a vote
  4. Passed one chamber
  5. Passed
  6. Enacted

Committee

Judiciary · New York State Assembly

Also referred to Judiciary · New York State Senate.

Your position on this bill

Choose the position closest to yours. You'll sign in or create an account to save it.

The sponsor's argument

Why the sponsor says this is needed

Study after study has demonstrated that judges of justice courts, also known as town, village, and city courts, account for the overwhelming majority of judicial misconduct cases and routinely result in New York- ers being denied their fundamental due process rights. Data indicates that this is exacerbated in rural areas, where these judges are often not attorneys. Expanding eligibility to those residing in the same New York State Assembly District would allow for the expansion of the pool of qualified justice courts. Unlike other jurisdictions, New York State Assembly Districts must be made up of like communities under state law. Most importantly, the judge will still be voted on only by the residents of the city, town, or village where the court is located. Town and village court justices make up the majority of all judges in New York State. In 2019, Monroe County's Democrat & Chronicle reported that "town and village justices comprise less than two-thirds of the roughly 3,400 judges in New York, yet account for 70 percent of the discipline cases brought by the State Commission on Judicial Conduct. Of those cases, 80% of the disciplined judges are non-lawyers, according to the Commission. This bill will help ensure that New Yorkers facing difficult times and who are now in front of our court system will have access to the fair administration of justice, and those voting for town, village, and city courts will have access to the most qualified judges available. PRIOR HISTORY: 2024: Similar Bill (A.1146/Lunsford) Died in Judiciary 2023: Similar Bill (A.1146/Lunsford) Died in Judiciary 2022: Similar Bill (A.9066/Lunsford) Died in Judiciary

This is the sponsor's own case for the bill, quoted from their memorandum. It is not Agora's description of what the bill does.

Full history

  1. Apr 29, 2025

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO JUDICIARY

    NY Senate

Read the record