Vote: Floor vote
NY SenateJun 11, 2025Result: passed
Sponsor · State Senator, District 26 · Democratic
Senate bill · S7980 (2025-26)
Relates to the determination of adjusted base proportions in special assessing units which are cities for fiscal year 2026.
Not chosen yet
Signed into law.
New York State Senate
Same as A8629, the matching bill in the Assembly.
Amends the Real Property Tax Law.
Cities 1 · New York State Senate
Also referred to Real Property Taxation · New York State Assembly, Ways and Means · New York State Assembly.
This bill would amend section 1803-a of the Real Property Tax Law to allow the local legislative body to amend the cap on the maximum class growth rate as long as it does not exceed 5 percent for fiscal year 2026.
Filed with the bill. Read it on nysenate.gov (opens in a new tab)
NY SenateJun 11, 2025Result: passed
Senate RulesJun 9, 2025Result: passed
The sponsor's argument
In order to determine how much of the levy to collect from each of the four tax classes next fiscal year, State law requires New York City to adopt class shares based on the equalization rates calculated by the State Board of Real Property Services (SBRPS). In most years, the rates provided by SBRPS would cause an increase to the tax burden for owners of class one property, comprising one-to-three-family homes. Currently, State law provides that the current base proportion of any of the City's four tax classes may not exceed the adjusted base proportion from the prior year by more than five percent. This bill would permit the local legislative body to lower the cap on the maximum allowable growth rate for the share of the overall tax levy paid by each class. Flexibility to lower this cap would allow the Council to adopt balanced tax rates for Fiscal 2026 that provide relief for class one homeowners without placing undue burden on the other property tax classes. The equalization rates have caused class one's tax rate to increase in ten of the past fifteen years, with six of those years seeing increases of over two percent. Conversely, the other three classes have seen much more balanced oscillations in their tax rates, with increases of over two percent only occurring three years for class three, one year for class four, and never for class two. Failure to enact this legislation would leave the City Council no option but to adopt the default SBRPS formula for establishing class shares. In that case, tax rates for class one and two may increase uncontrollably, and cause significant increases in the tax bills for residential home- owners. Limiting the tax rate increases for classes one and two that would result from SBRPS procedures is avoidable only through passage of this legislation.
This is the sponsor's own case for the bill, quoted from their memorandum. It is not Agora's description of what the bill does.
Signed
SIGNED CHAP.487
NY Senate
Sent to the executive
DELIVERED TO GOVERNOR
NY Senate
Ordered to Third Reading Rules CAL.764
ORDERED TO THIRD READING RULES CAL.764
NY Assembly
Passed a chamber
PASSED ASSEMBLY
NY Assembly
Reported out of committee
REPORTED
NY Assembly
Substituted
SUBSTITUTED FOR A8629
NY Assembly
Reported out of committee
REPORTED REFERRED TO RULES
NY Assembly
Sent to the executive
DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
NY Senate
Passed a chamber
PASSED SENATE
NY Senate
Referred to committee
REFERRED TO WAYS AND MEANS
NY Assembly
Reference Changed to Ways and Means
REFERENCE CHANGED TO WAYS AND MEANS
NY Assembly
In committee
COMMITTEE DISCHARGED AND COMMITTED TO RULES
NY Senate
Ordered to Third Reading CAL.1652
ORDERED TO THIRD READING CAL.1652
NY Senate
Referred to committee
REFERRED TO REAL PROPERTY TAXATION
NY Assembly
Referred to committee
REFERRED TO CITIES 1
NY Senate
The summary comes from NY Open Legislation, the New York State Senate's public record. For more, see How we handle summaries.
From NY Open Legislation, the NY Senate and Assembly, and official rosters. This record was last updated Oct 22, 2026. About our data