Increases penalties for reckless operation and unauthorized modification of electric personal mobility devices

• Republican1

◆ The sponsor's argument

Why George Borrello says this is needed

The rapid growth in the use of electric personal mobility devices, including electric bicycles, electric scooters, hoverboards, and elec- tric skateboards, has significantly changed transportation patterns across New York State. While these devices offer affordable and conven- ient mobility options, the Vehicle and Traffic Laws of New York State have not kept pace with emerging technologies, leaving gaps in defi- nitions, enforcement authority, and penalties for unsafe conduct. This legislation addresses those gaps by formally defining "electric skateboard" in statute and by establishing clear, graduated penalties for the reckless operation and illegal modification of electric personal mobility devices. At present, inconsistent definitions and limited enforcement tools make it difficult for law enforcement to respond effectively to dangerous behavior, particularly in pedestrian-heavy areas, school zones, and on sidewalks where these devices are frequently misused. Reckless operation, such as riding on sidewalks at high speeds, ignoring traffic control devices, traveling against traffic, or operating in a manner that endangers pedestrians, has led to a growing number of inju- ries, near-misses, and property damage incidents across the state. In addition, unauthorized modifications that override manufacturer speed limits or bypass safety features further increase the risk of serious harm by allowing devices to operate beyond their intended and safe design specifications. The legislation establishes stricter penalties that escalate for repeat offenses, emphasizing education and deterrence while providing law enforcement with meaningful tools, including temporary or permanent confiscation when warranted. It also creates specific consequences for illegal modifications, recognizing that altered devices pose heightened dangers not only to operators but to the public at large. Finally, the bill directs the Department of Transportation to develop and distribute comprehensive public education materials to ensure that operators understand where and how electric personal mobility devices may be lawfully used, applicable speed limits, helmet and age require- ments, and the serious consequences of reckless behavior or illegal modifications. This education component is essential to promoting compliance, improving safety, and ensuring consistent messaging state- wide. By clarifying definitions, strengthening enforcement mechanisms, and prioritizing public education, this legislation seeks to balance the benefits of electric personal mobility devices with the need to protect pedestrians, motorists, and riders, thereby promoting safer streets throughout New York State.

This is the sponsor's own case for the bill, quoted from their memorandum. It is not Agora's description of what the bill does.