Skip to main content

Senate bill · S8952 (2025-26)

Relates to disclosures by sellers of digital goods

Latest action May 20, 2026

New York State Senate

Same as A8471, the matching bill in the Assembly.

Sponsor

Patricia Fahy

State Senator, District 46 · Democratic

Follow

Summary

Prohibits a seller of a digital good from advertising or offering for sale a digital good to a purchaser with the terms "buy," "purchase," or any other term which a reasonable person would understand to confer an unrestricted ownership interest in the digital good, or alongside an option for a time-limited rental, unless the seller receives at the time of each transaction an affirmative acknowledgment from the purchaser, or the seller provides to the consumer before executing each transaction a clear and conspicuous statement.

Summary from NY Open Legislation. How we handle summaries

Amends the General Business Law.

From NY Open Legislation, the NY Senate and Assembly, and official rosters. This record was last updated Oct 20, 2026. About our data

Follow

Following needs an Agora account. You will sign in first, then come back to this page.

Your position on this bill

Choose the position closest to yours. You'll sign in or create an account to save it.

Purpose, from the sponsor's memo

To ensure that consumers are clearly informed when they are purchasing a license to access digital goods rather than acquiring full ownership, by mandating specific disclosures in advertisements and sales of such goods.

Filed with the bill. Read it on nysenate.gov (opens in a new tab)

Where it stands

Out of committee and scheduled for a vote by the full chamber.

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Up for a vote
  4. Passed one chamber
  5. Passed
  6. Enacted

Committee

Consumer Affairs and Protection · New York State Assembly

Also referred to Consumer Protection · New York State Senate.

The sponsor's argument

Why Patricia Fahy says this is needed

This bill ensures that New York consumers are clearly informed when purchasing digital goods-such as ebooks, music, or video games-that they are receiving a limited license, not full ownership. Currently, sellers can use terms like "buy" or "purchase" even when they retain the right to revoke access. This common but misleading practice leaves consumers confused and vulnerable when digital products they believed they owned are suddenly removed or restricted. The bill requires sellers who use ownership language to either obtain clear acknowledgment from the buyer that the transaction is a license, or provide a conspicuous notice before purchase explaining that access is limited and subject to terms. Disclosures must be plainly stated and separate from general terms and conditions. The bill exempts subscriptions, free digital goods, and permanently downloadable content. A similar law was recently adopted in California, setting a national precedent for transparency in digital transactions. New York should follow suit to protect its residents from deceptive advertising prac- tices and ensure fair treatment in the digital marketplace.

This is the sponsor's own case for the bill, quoted from their memorandum. It is not Agora's description of what the bill does.

Full history

  1. May 20, 2026

    Reported out of committee

    REPORTED REFERRED TO RULES

    NY Assembly

  2. May 5, 2026

    Reported out of committee

    REPORTED REFERRED TO CODES

    NY Assembly

  3. Jan 21, 2026

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO CONSUMER PROTECTION

    NY Senate

  4. Jan 7, 2026

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND PROTECTION

    NY Assembly

  5. May 16, 2025

    Referred to committee

    REFERRED TO CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND PROTECTION

    NY Assembly