Vote: Floor vote
NY SenateJun 4, 2026Result: passed
Senate bill · S9432 (2025-26)
New York State Senate
Same as A8421, the matching bill in the Assembly.
Sponsor: Andrew J. Lanza (State Senator, District 24, Republican/Conservative/Independence/Reform)
Provides that arbitration awards in consumer and employment disputes, where the arbitration is conducted pursuant to a contract, shall include all issues in dispute and findings thereon
The heading above is this same sentence with its legal opening removed. No words were added, changed or reordered.
Following needs an Agora account. You will sign in first, then come back to this page.
From NY Open Legislation, the NY Senate and Assembly, and official rosters. This record was last updated Oct 21, 2026. About our data
Provides that arbitration awards in consumer and employment disputes, where the arbitration is conducted pursuant to a contract, shall include all issues in dispute and the arbitrator's findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Summary from NY Open Legislation. How we handle summaries
This bill would require arbitrators who decide consumer or employment- related disputes to set forth the basis for their awards.
Filed with the bill. Read it on nysenate.gov (opens in a new tab)
Passed one of the two chambers; it still needs the other.
Judiciary · New York State Assembly
Also referred to Judiciary · New York State Senate.
Choose the position closest to yours. You'll sign in or create an account to save it.
Showing the cosponsors who are on Agora, A to Z. The official record may list more.
Read on NY Senate (opens in a new tab)Shown in neutral colors by design; Agora is non-partisan.
The sponsor's argument
It is well-settled that arbitrators are not required to explain or justify their awards. E.g. Colletti v. Mesh, 23 AD2d 245 (1st Dept), aff'd 17 NY2d 460 (1965). In recent years, there has been a prolifer- ation of arbitration hearings in consumer and employment matters. It is particularly important for consumers and employees to know the basis for awards rendered in hearings in which they have participated. This bill does not purport to be a burden upon arbitrators. Or otherwise amelio- rate any of the benefits of arbitration, such as speed and efficiency of adjudication. Still, it is difficult, if not impossible, for a losing arbitration participant to know whether any grounds exist to vacate the arbitration award pursuant to CPLR 7511 if the basis for the award remains unknown. This bill was modeled upon 11 NYCRR 65-4.5(s) which has worked well for many years in providing automobile insureds and insurers with the same basic information about arbitration awards in matters brought pursuant to Article 51 of the Insurance Law (no fault arbitrations.
This is the sponsor's own case for the bill, quoted from their memorandum. It is not Agora's description of what the bill does.
NY SenateJun 4, 2026Result: passed
Referred to committee
REFERRED TO JUDICIARY
NY Assembly
In committee
COMMITTEE DISCHARGED AND COMMITTED TO RULES
NY Senate
Sent to the executive
DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
NY Senate
Ordered to Third Reading CAL.1801
ORDERED TO THIRD READING CAL.1801
NY Senate
Passed a chamber
PASSED SENATE
NY Senate
Amend and Recommit to Judiciary
AMEND AND RECOMMIT TO JUDICIARY
NY Senate
Amend and Recommit to Judiciary
AMEND AND RECOMMIT TO JUDICIARY
NY Assembly
Referred to committee
REFERRED TO JUDICIARY
NY Senate
Referred to committee
REFERRED TO JUDICIARY
NY Assembly
Referred to committee
REFERRED TO JUDICIARY
NY Assembly