Relates to settlement negotiations in major electric, natural gas, water, and steam rate increase proceedings before the public service commission

Showing the cosponsors who are on Agora, A to Z. The official record may list more.

• Democratic1

Shown in neutral colors by design; Agora is non-partisan.

◆ The sponsor's argument

Why Leroy Comrie says this is needed

Settlement negotiations play a central role in determining the outcome of utility rate cases, which directly impact millions of New Yorkers through their electric, gas, water, and steam bills. However, the current process can vary significantly depending on the presiding personnel and lacks uniform structure, which may create inefficiencies, inconsistencies, and barriers to meaningful participation by stakehold- ers. By requiring trained administrative law judges to oversee settlement negotiations, this bill promotes a more organized, transparent, and equitable process. A neutral facilitator can help reduce procedural disputes, improve communication among parties, and ensure that all stakeholders, including consumer advocates, municipalities, and ratepay- ers, have a fair opportunity to participate. Standardizing the process across proceedings will enhance predictabili- ty, build trust in regulatory outcomes, and ultimately support more balanced and durable agreements. This reform aligns with best practices in dispute resolution and strengthens oversight of proceedings that have significant economic consequences for residents and businesses across New York.

This is the sponsor's own case for the bill, quoted from their memorandum. It is not Agora's description of what the bill does.