Skip to main content

House bill · H.R. 142 (119th Congress)

Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2025

U.S. House of Representatives

Latest action Jan 7, 2025

Sponsor: Kat Cammack (U.S. Representative, FL-3, Republican)

Follow

Following needs an Agora account. You will sign in first, then come back to this page.

From Congress.gov and official rosters. This record was last updated Jul 30, 2026. About our data

Summary

Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 20 25 This bill revises provisions relating to congressional review of agency rulemaking. Specifically, the bill establishes a congressional approval process for a major rule. A major rule may only take effect if Congress approves of the rule. A major rule is a rule that has resulted in or is likely to result in (1) an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; (2) a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, government agencies, or geographic regions; or (3) significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. The bill generally preserves the current congressional review process for a nonmajor rule.

Summary from the Congressional Research Service. How we handle summaries

Where it stands

Assigned to a committee for review.

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Up for a vote
  4. Passed one chamber
  5. Passed
  6. Enacted

Committee

House Committee on the Judiciary · U.S. House of Representatives

Also referred to Senate Committee on the Judiciary · U.S. Senate.

Your position on this bill

Choose the position closest to yours. You'll sign in or create an account to save it.

Cosponsors

93

Showing the 91 who are on Agora, A to Z. Congress.gov listed 93 as of Aug 1, 2026.

See all cosponsors on Congress.gov (opens in a new tab)
  • Republican91

Party is shown for the 91 cosponsors who are on Agora.

Shown in neutral colors by design; Agora is non-partisan.

As identified by Congress.gov.

Full history

  1. Jan 7, 2025

    Introduced

    Introduced in U.S. House

    U.S. House

  2. Jan 3, 2025

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    U.S. House of Representatives

  3. Jan 3, 2025

    In committee

    Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Rules, and the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    U.S. House

  4. Jan 3, 2025

    Referred to committee

    Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Rules, and the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  5. Jan 3, 2025

    Referred to committee

    Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Rules, and the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Show full history (1 earlier event)
  1. Jan 3, 2025

    Referred to committee

    Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Rules, and the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Read the record