Skip to main content

House bill · H.R. 35 (119th Congress)

Agent Raul Gonzalez Officer Safety Act

U.S. House of Representatives

Latest action Feb 13, 2025

Sponsor: Juan Ciscomani (U.S. Representative, AZ-6, Republican)

Follow

Following needs an Agora account. You will sign in first, then come back to this page.

From Congress.gov and official rosters. This record was last updated Aug 1, 2026. About our data

Summary

Agent Raul Gonzalez Officer Safety Act This bill establishes new federal criminal offenses for operating a motor vehicle within 100 miles of the U.S. border while fleeing from a U.S. Border Patrol agent or a federal, state, or local law enforcement officer who is actively assisting or under the command of the U.S. Border Patrol. The bill establishes criminal penalties for an offense, including a mandatory minimum prison term for an offense resulting in death or serious bodily injury. Additionally, a non-U.S. national who is convicted of or admits to committing an offense is inadmissible, deportable, and ineligible for immigration relief (including asylum).

Summary from the Congressional Research Service. How we handle summaries

Where it stands

Passed one of the two chambers; it still needs the other.

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Up for a vote
  4. Passed one chamber
  5. Passed
  6. Enacted

Committee

House Committee on the Judiciary · U.S. House of Representatives

Your position on this bill

Choose the position closest to yours. You'll sign in or create an account to save it.

Cosponsors

Recorded votes

  • Vote: On Passage

    U.S. HouseFeb 13, 2025Result: Passed

    (264) (155) (0) (14)

As identified by Congress.gov.

Full history

  1. Feb 13, 2025

    Debate - the House Proceeded With One Hour of Debate on H.R. 35.

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 35.

    U.S. House of Representatives

  2. Feb 13, 2025

    Passed a chamber

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  3. Feb 13, 2025

    Passed a chamber

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  4. Feb 13, 2025

    Passed a chamber

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  5. Feb 13, 2025

    Passed a chamber

    Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 264 - 155 (Roll no. 42). (text: CR H683)

    U.S. House of Representatives

Show full history (8 earlier events)
  1. Feb 13, 2025

    In committee

    Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

    U.S. House

  2. Feb 13, 2025

    Sent to the executive

    Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

    U.S. Senate

  3. Feb 13, 2025

    The Previous Question Was Ordered Pursuant to the rule.

    The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

  4. Feb 13, 2025

    The Previous Question Was Ordered Pursuant to the rule.

    The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

  5. Feb 13, 2025

    The Previous Question Was Ordered Pursuant to the rule.

    The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

  6. Jan 3, 2025

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    U.S. House of Representatives

  7. Jan 3, 2025

    Introduced

    Introduced in U.S. House

    U.S. House

  8. Jan 3, 2025

    Referred to committee

    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

    U.S. House of Representatives

Read the record