Skip to main content

House bill · H.R. 6048 (119th Congress)

NDO Fairness Act

U.S. House of Representatives

Latest action Sep 14, 2026

Sponsor: Scott Fitzgerald (U.S. Representative, WI-5, Republican)

Follow

Following needs an Agora account. You will sign in first, then come back to this page.

From Congress.gov and official rosters. This record was last updated Sep 23, 2026. About our data

Summary

NDO Fairness Act This bill increases the requirements the government must meet to obtain a nondisclosure order (NDO) under the Stored Communications Act (SCA). The SCA generally prohibits providers of remote computing services or electronic communication services (providers) from disclosing stored electronic communications or records (e.g., emails) or information pertaining to customers or subscribers. However, the SCA authorizes the government seek a warrant, order, or subpoena to compel providers to disclose electronic communications or records or information pertaining to customers or subscribers during an investigation. Providers may notify customers and subscribers of the warrant, order, or subpoena unless the government obtains a court order—an NDO—that delays the notification. This bill raises the standard the government must meet to obtain (or extend) an NDO. The bill also requires the court, before issuing an NDO, to issue a written determination that the standard was met based on specific and articulable facts, and to review the underlying warrant, order, or subpoena. The bill requires NDOs to be narrowly tailored. It also limits their duration to 90 days for most investigations, though it permits a duration of up to one year for investigations pertaining to an offense involving child pornography or sexual exploitation of children. Finally, the bill requires the Department of Justice to report annually on data related to NDOs, including the number of customers or subscribers targeted; applications for orders; orders granted, extended, or denied; and orders targeting members of the media or conduct related to certain protected activities.

Summary from the Congressional Research Service. How we handle summaries

Where it stands

Passed one of the two chambers; it still needs the other.

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Up for a vote
  4. Passed one chamber
  5. Passed
  6. Enacted

Committee

House Committee on the Judiciary · U.S. House of Representatives

Your position on this bill

Choose the position closest to yours. You'll sign in or create an account to save it.

Cosponsors

1

Cosponsors listed on Congress.gov, shown A to Z.

  • Democratic1

Shown in neutral colors by design; Agora is non-partisan.

As identified by Congress.gov.

Full history

  1. Sep 14, 2026

    Sent to the executive

    Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

    U.S. Senate

  2. Aug 31, 2026

    Considered Under Suspension of the rules. (consideration: cr H5266-5268)

    Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5266-5268)

  3. Aug 31, 2026

    Considered Under Suspension of the rules. (consideration: cr H5266-5268)

    Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5266-5268)

  4. Aug 31, 2026

    Debate - the House Proceeded With Forty Minutes of Debate on H.R. 6048.

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 6048.

    U.S. House of Representatives

  5. Aug 31, 2026

    Passed a chamber

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Show full history (15 earlier events)
  1. Aug 31, 2026

    Passed a chamber

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  2. Aug 31, 2026

    Passed a chamber

    Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

    U.S. House of Representatives

  3. Nov 20, 2025

    Committee vote

    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

  4. Nov 20, 2025

    Committee vote

    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

  5. Nov 20, 2025

    Committee vote

    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

  6. Nov 20, 2025

    Reported out of committee

    Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  7. Nov 20, 2025

    Introduced

    Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

    U.S. House

  8. Nov 20, 2025

    Reported out of committee

    Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  9. Nov 20, 2025

    Reported out of committee

    Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  10. Nov 18, 2025

    Committee vote

    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

  11. Nov 18, 2025

    Committee vote

    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

  12. Nov 18, 2025

    Committee vote

    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

  13. Nov 17, 2025

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    U.S. House of Representatives

  14. Nov 17, 2025

    Introduced

    Introduced in U.S. House

    U.S. House

  15. Nov 17, 2025

    Referred to committee

    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

    U.S. House of Representatives

Read the record