Senate bill · S. 3663 (119th Congress)
NDO Fairness Act of 2026
U.S. Senate
Sponsor: Christopher A. Coons (U.S. Senator for Delaware, Democratic)
Following needs an Agora account. You will sign in first, then come back to this page.
From Congress.gov and official rosters. This record was last updated Aug 1, 2026. About our data
Summary
NDO Fairness Act of 2026 This bill increases the requirements the government must meet to obtain a nondisclosure order (NDO) under the Stored Communications Act (SCA). The SCA generally prohibits providers of remote computing services or electronic communication services (providers) from disclosing stored electronic communications or records (e.g., emails) or information pertaining to customers or subscribers. However, the SCA authorizes the government seek a warrant, order, or subpoena to compel providers to disclose electronic communications or records or information pertaining to customers or subscribers during an investigation. Providers may notify customers and subscribers of the warrant, order, or subpoena unless the government obtains a court order—an NDO—that delays the notification. This bill raises the standard the government must meet to obtain (or extend) an NDO. The bill also requires the court, before issuing an NDO, to issue a written determination that the standard was met based on specific and articulable facts, and to review the underlying warrant, order, or subpoena. The bill requires NDOs to be narrowly tailored. It also limits their duration to 90 days for most investigations, though it permits a duration of up to one year for investigations pertaining to an offense involving child pornography or sexual exploitation of children. Finally, the bill requires the Department of Justice to report annually on NDO-related data, including the number of customers or subscribers targeted; applications for orders; orders granted, extended, or denied; and orders targeting members of the media or conduct related to certain protected activities.
Summary from the Congressional Research Service. How we handle summaries
Where it stands
Assigned to a committee for review.
- Introduced
- In committee
- Up for a vote
- Passed one chamber
- Passed
- Enacted
Committee
House Committee on the Judiciary · U.S. House of Representatives
Also referred to Senate Committee on the Judiciary · U.S. Senate.
Your position on this bill
Choose the position closest to yours. You'll sign in or create an account to save it.
Cosponsors
5
Cosponsors listed on Congress.gov, shown A to Z.
- Republican3
- Democratic2
This bill has cosponsors from more than one party.
Shown in neutral colors by design; Agora is non-partisan.
Related bills
As identified by Congress.gov.
Full history
- Jan 15, 2026
Introduced
Introduced in U.S. Senate
U.S. Senate
- Jan 15, 2026
Referred to committee
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- Jan 15, 2026
Referred to committee
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- Jan 15, 2026
Referred to committee
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Read the record
- Read on Congress.gov (opens in a new tab) The official record on Congress.gov.